John F. Kennedy was a kind, gentle man who was shot in a conspiracy that can be traced back through documents that have been Unclassified by the CIA and FBI.
He said those two statements in the 1960s. From my point of view I was just entering High School when he said them. It appeared to me that everybody trusted the government at that time.
The next president appointed a Warren Commission within a few days to investigate and report on JFK's assassination. The final report claimed that "one shooter" was responsible which I have since learned was not true.
10 months before the end of World War I the then President of the US was Woodrow Wilson made a speech to congress.
It is my belief that in those days Congress consisted of Statesmen rather than politicians. "Statesmen" will do what is best what is best for the next generation as compared to our "politicians" who are only looking to what will benefit them in the next election.
Anyway, the speech contains 14 points and was intended to "the culminating and final war for human liberty." The very first point is as follows:
"Open covenants of peace must be arrived at, after which there will surely be no private international action or rulings of any kind, but diplomacy shall proceed always frankly and in the public view. "
I left a lot of space around it so that even those that just glance at this long answer may read it. At the end of World War II, the United Nations was established as the place for all member countries to resolve their disputes peacefully.
I encourage you to read the CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS at the following link. http://www.un.org/aboutun/charter/index.html
because it contains verbiage similar to the Declaration of Indepenence and "to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind" another attempt by man to prevent war.
It is my belief that the reason that the United Nations (UN) failed was because many of the countries that are members of the UN have created their own secret government agencies such as the CIA which have been empowered to do covert operations. Israel has their version, as does Iran, Germany, Italy, Egypt, Pakistan, India, Britian, France, etc.
Here again is the first point of Woodrow Wilson's speech. Do you see anyplace where it says it is ok to smile at someone in public while you are interferring with the running of another government behind their back tactics or killing your own citizens ?
"Open covenants of peace must be arrived at, after which there will surely be no private international action or rulings of any kind, but diplomacy shall proceed always frankly and in the public view. "
OPEN means in front of, not hidden or closed.
I think that we are in such a mess because the first President Bush set US up. He had been a Director of the CIA and had been used to running covert operations and lieing. He did not know how to be honest and open and apparently he did not teach his son those points either.
I believe that, the powers that be thought it was absolutly necessary that GWB be named president in the 2000 presidential election. To much time and money had already changed hands. All that would have been lost, as they say, to people you don't say "no" to setting the stage for 9/11/01.
It didn't take the President very long to Decide who the culprets were but it took over a year before he finally gave in to the pressure to investigate the whos and hows. He aslo inteferred with the investigation and demanded a deadline for the issuance of the "Official 9/11/01 Commission Report".
I think that the Official Story is a fraud just as the insurance claims that were filled using the reason that the President gave before appointing an investigation. I better stop here. I gave you a link below where there are FREE VIDEO DOWNLOADS available and I am asking that you at least look at "911: In Plane Site" and decide for yourself.
Regarding the 2000 presidential election. I would like to remind you that Al Gore had been declared the winner of the State of Florida (Jeb Bush was Governor); a voter fraud scandal broke out after Florida gave their electorial votes to Jeb's brother George W. Bush; the matter went to the US Supreme Court, which included Judges that were appointed by George W's father George H. W. Bush when he was president.
Mankind must learn to be honest with each other and must learn respect for each other. They have yet to try the way that President Woodrow Wilson suggested, which I have again repeated below.
"Open covenants of peace must be arrived at, after which there will surely be no private international action or rulings of any kind, but diplomacy shall proceed always frankly and in the public view. "
I think that I am doing the right thing by spending my time trying to educate the interested readers about the reasons that I have learned from my experiances. I am not getting paid and I hope that I am not wasting my time. I also hope that I do not just disappear.
I think I included an answer to the first quote and by submitting this answer I think that I have given you an example of the second.
When we used to go camping, we learned to take care of mother earth and left our camping area cleaner than when we arrived. I apoligize to the next generation that I was not able to foresee the terrible condition that this country has made and is continuing to make of the world.
I don't think that George W. Bush wants to know the truth. The man is mentally unstable.
Friday, April 20, 2007
Thursday, April 19, 2007
Response to a blog by John Doe
Title: Items you left out
You did not include that The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PA) has a September 1998 press release that announces the "first successful landing of a commercial flight at Newark International Airport using the Global Positioning system".
Two weeks later they released another that announced a "Historic Shift" in the PA's planning by putting the World Trade Center Complex on the open market.
It had been common knowledge that the PA had been losing millions of dollars operating the towers every year as well as looking at a massive job to remove the asbestos that was declared illegal after the initial construction.
I would suggest that you visit the following website:
http://www.panynj.gov/AboutthePortAuthority/PressCenter/PressReleases/
The press releases only go back as far as 1998.
It was unnecessary for anybody to be trained to fly the aircraft that were built just for the purpose of getting through the outer shell and putting on a glorious display of the explosions.
Look at the video of "9/11: In Plane Site" Free Video Download can be obtained at : http://www.question911.com/linksall.htm
There was an article written originally in Spanish by a Spanish news reporter using the picture that appeared on the cover of a magazine ("Newsweek" or "Newsday"). The picture shows the Pod that is mentioned in the video. The article went on how the reporter had contacted Boeing to identify the aircraft. It was clearly not a normal passenger airplane. The article showed how the engines were different distances from the body of the aircraft. And explained why it was necessary to move at least one engine to act as a counter weight to offset the weight of the Pod and whatever the Pod carried.
The video 911 In Plane Site shows a flash from the front of the plane just before impact. I think that the flash was the firing of a missile to insure that the entire aircraft would penetrate the outer shell. The flimsy skin of a regular passenger jet would have folded onto the side of the building or at least left pieces like the wings and/or tail sections would have fallen. Hell birds have caused quite a bit of damage to the flimsy skin when they get hit. This plane had to be reinforced.
The video 911: In Plane Site also replays the only released footage of the first planes impact which also shows a similar flash before impact.
The lack of fire after the initial burning of the highly explosive fuel is evidenced by a woman standing in the hole caused by the aircraft.
There are tapes from the fire department that indicated that there was a small fire and that it could be contained with two hoses.
President Woodrow Wilson was right in his speech to Congress of the United States 10 months before World War I ended. The entire 14 point speech can be read at:
http://www.historyplace.com/speeches/wilson-points.htm
I think that the first point of his speech is the most important. It is as follows: "Open covenants of peace must be arrived at, after which there will surely be no private international action or rulings of any kind, but diplomacy shall proceed always frankly and in the public view."
No covert operations are mentioned.
After World War II, the great leaders formed the United Nations. There is no mention of the necessity to have covert operations.
http://www.un.org/
Your Blog mentions quite a few different countries that have quite a few different covert operations organizations.
With all the covert operations, agencies, etc. Who is in charge of all of these covert operations. It's no wonder we can win in Iraq. The US Army is fighting covert operators from all over the world.
Why can't all the covert operations be disbanded so the people of the world can really see what is going on and get back to the business of saving the planet from global warming and feed the hungry.
Have a covert operation olympic event.
See if the CIA can win a gold medal.
How many agents are double agents and/or triple agents?
How many agents are members of Skull & Bones?
You did not include that The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PA) has a September 1998 press release that announces the "first successful landing of a commercial flight at Newark International Airport using the Global Positioning system".
Two weeks later they released another that announced a "Historic Shift" in the PA's planning by putting the World Trade Center Complex on the open market.
It had been common knowledge that the PA had been losing millions of dollars operating the towers every year as well as looking at a massive job to remove the asbestos that was declared illegal after the initial construction.
I would suggest that you visit the following website:
http://www.panynj.gov/AboutthePortAuthority/PressCenter/PressReleases/
The press releases only go back as far as 1998.
It was unnecessary for anybody to be trained to fly the aircraft that were built just for the purpose of getting through the outer shell and putting on a glorious display of the explosions.
Look at the video of "9/11: In Plane Site" Free Video Download can be obtained at : http://www.question911.com/linksall.htm
There was an article written originally in Spanish by a Spanish news reporter using the picture that appeared on the cover of a magazine ("Newsweek" or "Newsday"). The picture shows the Pod that is mentioned in the video. The article went on how the reporter had contacted Boeing to identify the aircraft. It was clearly not a normal passenger airplane. The article showed how the engines were different distances from the body of the aircraft. And explained why it was necessary to move at least one engine to act as a counter weight to offset the weight of the Pod and whatever the Pod carried.
The video 911 In Plane Site shows a flash from the front of the plane just before impact. I think that the flash was the firing of a missile to insure that the entire aircraft would penetrate the outer shell. The flimsy skin of a regular passenger jet would have folded onto the side of the building or at least left pieces like the wings and/or tail sections would have fallen. Hell birds have caused quite a bit of damage to the flimsy skin when they get hit. This plane had to be reinforced.
The video 911: In Plane Site also replays the only released footage of the first planes impact which also shows a similar flash before impact.
The lack of fire after the initial burning of the highly explosive fuel is evidenced by a woman standing in the hole caused by the aircraft.
There are tapes from the fire department that indicated that there was a small fire and that it could be contained with two hoses.
President Woodrow Wilson was right in his speech to Congress of the United States 10 months before World War I ended. The entire 14 point speech can be read at:
http://www.historyplace.com/speeches/wilson-points.htm
I think that the first point of his speech is the most important. It is as follows: "Open covenants of peace must be arrived at, after which there will surely be no private international action or rulings of any kind, but diplomacy shall proceed always frankly and in the public view."
No covert operations are mentioned.
After World War II, the great leaders formed the United Nations. There is no mention of the necessity to have covert operations.
http://www.un.org/
Your Blog mentions quite a few different countries that have quite a few different covert operations organizations.
With all the covert operations, agencies, etc. Who is in charge of all of these covert operations. It's no wonder we can win in Iraq. The US Army is fighting covert operators from all over the world.
Why can't all the covert operations be disbanded so the people of the world can really see what is going on and get back to the business of saving the planet from global warming and feed the hungry.
Have a covert operation olympic event.
See if the CIA can win a gold medal.
How many agents are double agents and/or triple agents?
How many agents are members of Skull & Bones?
Tuesday, April 17, 2007
Response to a Question of a Tax on Assets
April 17, 2007, The filing deadline for the 2006 U.S Individual Income Tax Returns.
It is my honest opinion that before the United States will ever tax people for their assets that they will have to simplify and make fairer the income tax regulations. Individual as well as for the corporations, partnerships, and other businesses.
It used to be that a high school student who had a part time job could prepare his own income tax returns. It is no longer that simple. I don't know many high school students that are over 18 years old which happens to be the new age where his income can be charged as a kiddie tax (applying his parents rates to his income).
Did Congress have to stoop so low as to increase a high school students income taxes because the wealthy did not want an increase and congress was able to sell the public the tax package as they "lowered the income taxes - vote for me". They didn't lower the income taxes for that high school student as a matter of fact all Congress did was increase his taxes and they also made the tax laws so complicated that the middle class can no longer prepare their own returns and have to hire professionals that are so busy worrying about getting the returns filled out that they are overlooking whether that amounts that their clients give them are the right amounts.
I once was working at a place that had hired a Master Mason from England to teach some apprentices the art of cutting stone. He asked me to help him with his tax returns over 25 years ago. He lived in Queens NY and had 3 returns to prepare (federal, state of NY and City of NY). As I asked him for the information requested by the forms he said to me: "I don't understand why all this is necessary. In England that take a percentage right off the top and you never see it again but you don't have to file any of this paper either. In England we don't have to pay for separate helath insurance either."
It is for this reason that I don't think any party will start a "Wealth Tax".
It is my honest opinion that before the United States will ever tax people for their assets that they will have to simplify and make fairer the income tax regulations. Individual as well as for the corporations, partnerships, and other businesses.
It used to be that a high school student who had a part time job could prepare his own income tax returns. It is no longer that simple. I don't know many high school students that are over 18 years old which happens to be the new age where his income can be charged as a kiddie tax (applying his parents rates to his income).
Did Congress have to stoop so low as to increase a high school students income taxes because the wealthy did not want an increase and congress was able to sell the public the tax package as they "lowered the income taxes - vote for me". They didn't lower the income taxes for that high school student as a matter of fact all Congress did was increase his taxes and they also made the tax laws so complicated that the middle class can no longer prepare their own returns and have to hire professionals that are so busy worrying about getting the returns filled out that they are overlooking whether that amounts that their clients give them are the right amounts.
I once was working at a place that had hired a Master Mason from England to teach some apprentices the art of cutting stone. He asked me to help him with his tax returns over 25 years ago. He lived in Queens NY and had 3 returns to prepare (federal, state of NY and City of NY). As I asked him for the information requested by the forms he said to me: "I don't understand why all this is necessary. In England that take a percentage right off the top and you never see it again but you don't have to file any of this paper either. In England we don't have to pay for separate helath insurance either."
It is for this reason that I don't think any party will start a "Wealth Tax".
Should Iraq be called "war against covert operations"?
Ten months before the end of World War I - the US President Woodrow Wilson made a speech to the US Congress that contained 14 points.
"The Fourteen Points outlined in this speech served as both the basis for peace and the hopeful establishment of a better post-war world at the conclusion of "the culminating and final war for human liberty."
http://www.historyplace.com/speeches/wilson-points.htm
I think that the first point is the most important. It follows:
"1. Open covenants of peace must be arrived at, after which there will surely be no private international action or rulings of any kind, but diplomacy shall proceed always frankly and in the public view."
Notice the lack of mention of covert organizations.
After WW II they formed the United Nations to be an organization where countries could settle their grievances.
http://www.un.org/aboutun/mainbodies.htm
Also notice the lack of mention of the need for covert organizations.
I think that history, especially the current history has been proven President Wilson was right.
The United States has had it's covert operations performed by at least the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Intelligence_Agency
There is a great deal of controversy about who has determined what their covert operations have done and are doing. There is evidence that the CIA was involved as far back as the Cuba crisis. Free video downloads are available at: http://www.question911.com/linksall.htm
It is my belief that the events that occurred on 9/11/2001 were actually at least three covert operations.
1) The purpose of the covert operation in NYC was to clear the buildings from the property that belonged to The Port of Authority of New York and New Jersey. This blog will not go into details but the term "Jewish Lightning" may give a clue.
2) The section of the Pentagon that was hit by something was being renovated and the books were being audited. The rings There was a report on September 10, 2001 about how they could not account for Trillions of dollars or simply a diversion from the prime NYC operation. This is not the purpose of this blog.
3) The other site was Shanksville, PA. From what I read it may have been a test of some sort of electromagnetic weapon to find out what effects it would have and the area coverage of the ground or simply a diversion from the prime NYC operation. This is not the purpose of this blog.
How does President Bush know that he is not sending the US Army soldiers into harms way in Iraq because of various covert operations preformed by other countries that have fooled him into thinking that they are our friends ? Worse than that would be that the covert operations were being run by the Haliburton contractors in Iran. More troops in harms way will never resolve multiple covert operations by rogue agents and countries. Who knows how many covert agents belong to more than one covert agency. Where do their real loyalties belong?
President Bush ought to re-examine the loyalties of his own Vice-President. His 2006 income tax return reported over $1,000,000.00 of income on a salary of about $200,000.00. Is he really loyal to the $200,000.00 job that is scheduled to end on 12/31/2007? Is any of the other income result from the failure of the war in Iraq ?
I know that other countries such as Israel, Pakistan, Italy, Germany, Russia, India, Saudi Arabia and Iran have their own agencies to provide covert operations. Who makes the decisions about what covert operations happen? And are the the decision makers sure that the covert operations that the only covert operations that are being done? To whom are the agents of the covert operation organizations accountable? How do the covert operators know that they aren't the reason that Iraq has remained at war.
Who knows who is on whose side ?
Who knows who is really the "bad guy" when all the "guys" are equally bad ?
The other day there was a news article about an alleged retired FBI agent who had done some other work for the FBI on a consulting basis that just happened to decide that he wanted to take a "vacation" in Iran. Yeah right. The US doesn't even have "diplomatic relations" with Iran and this guy just decided that out of all the vacation paradises in the world he chose Iran. What was he thinking ?
Have the citizens of the world lost control to the covert operation agencies?
If it were up to me I'd say the war will end when all of the "secret organizations" in every country stop receiving funding. The CIA won't last long with selling their drugs. I don't know if Israel, Pakistan, Iran, Iraq, Britain, etc. ,etc. are doing the same.
President Woodrow Wilson was right. History has proven that, and we are caught in a quagmire because it was never done. So I'll repeat it again below:
"1. Open covenants of peace must be arrived at, after which there will surely be no private international action or rulings of any kind, but diplomacy shall proceed always frankly and in the public view."
Maybe the United Nations should step in and prepare a Treaty that calls for the disbanding of all of the secretive covert operations agencies of the world.
Those nations that are to small to have one are potential victims of those that have them.
Can't we all just learn to live together in peace ?
"The Fourteen Points outlined in this speech served as both the basis for peace and the hopeful establishment of a better post-war world at the conclusion of "the culminating and final war for human liberty."
http://www.historyplace.com/speeches/wilson-points.htm
I think that the first point is the most important. It follows:
"1. Open covenants of peace must be arrived at, after which there will surely be no private international action or rulings of any kind, but diplomacy shall proceed always frankly and in the public view."
Notice the lack of mention of covert organizations.
After WW II they formed the United Nations to be an organization where countries could settle their grievances.
http://www.un.org/aboutun/mainbodies.htm
Also notice the lack of mention of the need for covert organizations.
I think that history, especially the current history has been proven President Wilson was right.
The United States has had it's covert operations performed by at least the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Intelligence_Agency
There is a great deal of controversy about who has determined what their covert operations have done and are doing. There is evidence that the CIA was involved as far back as the Cuba crisis. Free video downloads are available at: http://www.question911.com/linksall.htm
It is my belief that the events that occurred on 9/11/2001 were actually at least three covert operations.
1) The purpose of the covert operation in NYC was to clear the buildings from the property that belonged to The Port of Authority of New York and New Jersey. This blog will not go into details but the term "Jewish Lightning" may give a clue.
2) The section of the Pentagon that was hit by something was being renovated and the books were being audited. The rings There was a report on September 10, 2001 about how they could not account for Trillions of dollars or simply a diversion from the prime NYC operation. This is not the purpose of this blog.
3) The other site was Shanksville, PA. From what I read it may have been a test of some sort of electromagnetic weapon to find out what effects it would have and the area coverage of the ground or simply a diversion from the prime NYC operation. This is not the purpose of this blog.
How does President Bush know that he is not sending the US Army soldiers into harms way in Iraq because of various covert operations preformed by other countries that have fooled him into thinking that they are our friends ? Worse than that would be that the covert operations were being run by the Haliburton contractors in Iran. More troops in harms way will never resolve multiple covert operations by rogue agents and countries. Who knows how many covert agents belong to more than one covert agency. Where do their real loyalties belong?
President Bush ought to re-examine the loyalties of his own Vice-President. His 2006 income tax return reported over $1,000,000.00 of income on a salary of about $200,000.00. Is he really loyal to the $200,000.00 job that is scheduled to end on 12/31/2007? Is any of the other income result from the failure of the war in Iraq ?
I know that other countries such as Israel, Pakistan, Italy, Germany, Russia, India, Saudi Arabia and Iran have their own agencies to provide covert operations. Who makes the decisions about what covert operations happen? And are the the decision makers sure that the covert operations that the only covert operations that are being done? To whom are the agents of the covert operation organizations accountable? How do the covert operators know that they aren't the reason that Iraq has remained at war.
Who knows who is on whose side ?
Who knows who is really the "bad guy" when all the "guys" are equally bad ?
The other day there was a news article about an alleged retired FBI agent who had done some other work for the FBI on a consulting basis that just happened to decide that he wanted to take a "vacation" in Iran. Yeah right. The US doesn't even have "diplomatic relations" with Iran and this guy just decided that out of all the vacation paradises in the world he chose Iran. What was he thinking ?
Have the citizens of the world lost control to the covert operation agencies?
If it were up to me I'd say the war will end when all of the "secret organizations" in every country stop receiving funding. The CIA won't last long with selling their drugs. I don't know if Israel, Pakistan, Iran, Iraq, Britain, etc. ,etc. are doing the same.
President Woodrow Wilson was right. History has proven that, and we are caught in a quagmire because it was never done. So I'll repeat it again below:
"1. Open covenants of peace must be arrived at, after which there will surely be no private international action or rulings of any kind, but diplomacy shall proceed always frankly and in the public view."
Maybe the United Nations should step in and prepare a Treaty that calls for the disbanding of all of the secretive covert operations agencies of the world.
Those nations that are to small to have one are potential victims of those that have them.
Can't we all just learn to live together in peace ?
Thursday, April 5, 2007
Response to Barack's question about the democratic process
Let me answer your question with another question - What democratic process are you referring to ? I don't know of any that exist.
Since G.W. Bush was appointed president by the US Supreme Court in 2000. They didn't think that Jeb Bush's state of Florida would be won by Al Gore, so they stole the election. I have come to believe that had the US Supreme Court ruled in favor of the truth rather than appoint G.W. Bush the tradgic events on 9/11/01 would not have happened.
I discovered that 9/11/01 was a planned series of government operations and the 9/11 Official Commission was told what reasons to put in their Official Report rather than the Truth and nobody in the current government dares come forward and even bring it up as an election issue.
Is the democratic process that you are referring to just pretending that a non-existent plane flown by hyjakers who were reported seen alive after the alledged crash into the Pentagon where GWB ordered a memorial to be erected so he can have a photo-op every September ?
I suggest that you be inovative and try the Truth. Start a Congressional investigation into the family relationships and financial relationships between the Bin Ladens and the Bush family or a real investigation into the events of 9/11/01 rather than running around the country being a distraction for GWB and his money making Iraq war. We are probably paying people on both sides just to keep it going. Where do you think the billions and trillions that the Pentagon can't account for go ? It isn't going into a democratic process.
I might not distrust a democratic process if I could find an honest one. I have already apoligized to my son for not leaving the earth in better condition than it was when I came into the world. I guess I was just naive that everybody was honest.
Congress could get more people involved if they started an independent investigation rather than a commission that was told what result to write a report to support, which happened to match the reasons on the insurance claims that had been filed and in the documents filed in the Federal courts before the end of Novemeber 2001 and the Commission didn't start until 2003.
That massive insurance fraud in NYC, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Mr Silverstein and Mr Frank Lowy and his Westfield Group that we all are paying for with the new insurance product (Terrorism Risk Insurance Act) given by the government to the insurance industry to prevent any insurance investigations during the iillegal removal of evidence during Mr Guiliani's term as Mayor of NYC.
The refusal of Boeing to identify POD on bottom of aircraft for "national security reasons"; "crashes" of non-existent aircraft that left no debris or bodies (PA & Pentagon).
The planned demolition of wtc 7 has yet to be explained.
I'm just an old forensic accountant. It seems nobody is interested in the truth anymore.
The government keeps changing tax regulations with a degree of complexity that so that middle income people can't do their own returns anymore and the professionals are more concerned getting numbers in the right places rather than getting the numbers right.
I can go on but you don't want to hear anymore anyway.
Since G.W. Bush was appointed president by the US Supreme Court in 2000. They didn't think that Jeb Bush's state of Florida would be won by Al Gore, so they stole the election. I have come to believe that had the US Supreme Court ruled in favor of the truth rather than appoint G.W. Bush the tradgic events on 9/11/01 would not have happened.
I discovered that 9/11/01 was a planned series of government operations and the 9/11 Official Commission was told what reasons to put in their Official Report rather than the Truth and nobody in the current government dares come forward and even bring it up as an election issue.
Is the democratic process that you are referring to just pretending that a non-existent plane flown by hyjakers who were reported seen alive after the alledged crash into the Pentagon where GWB ordered a memorial to be erected so he can have a photo-op every September ?
I suggest that you be inovative and try the Truth. Start a Congressional investigation into the family relationships and financial relationships between the Bin Ladens and the Bush family or a real investigation into the events of 9/11/01 rather than running around the country being a distraction for GWB and his money making Iraq war. We are probably paying people on both sides just to keep it going. Where do you think the billions and trillions that the Pentagon can't account for go ? It isn't going into a democratic process.
I might not distrust a democratic process if I could find an honest one. I have already apoligized to my son for not leaving the earth in better condition than it was when I came into the world. I guess I was just naive that everybody was honest.
Congress could get more people involved if they started an independent investigation rather than a commission that was told what result to write a report to support, which happened to match the reasons on the insurance claims that had been filed and in the documents filed in the Federal courts before the end of Novemeber 2001 and the Commission didn't start until 2003.
That massive insurance fraud in NYC, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Mr Silverstein and Mr Frank Lowy and his Westfield Group that we all are paying for with the new insurance product (Terrorism Risk Insurance Act) given by the government to the insurance industry to prevent any insurance investigations during the iillegal removal of evidence during Mr Guiliani's term as Mayor of NYC.
The refusal of Boeing to identify POD on bottom of aircraft for "national security reasons"; "crashes" of non-existent aircraft that left no debris or bodies (PA & Pentagon).
The planned demolition of wtc 7 has yet to be explained.
I'm just an old forensic accountant. It seems nobody is interested in the truth anymore.
The government keeps changing tax regulations with a degree of complexity that so that middle income people can't do their own returns anymore and the professionals are more concerned getting numbers in the right places rather than getting the numbers right.
I can go on but you don't want to hear anymore anyway.
Sunday, February 18, 2007
The NWO does not want 9/11 as a voting issue
» edit | reply | 2 points The NWO does not want 9/11 as a voting issue
.. they will keep the war going in Iraq as a diversion as well as take advantage of every other opportunity to keep the truth hidden.
The truth movement needs to make re-opening the investigation a voting issue.
It is my belief that 9/11 would not have happened if George Bush was not appointed President in 2000.
The Pentagon and Shanksville were diversions for the real insurance fraud staged by the wealthy elitists involved with the advanced planning of clearing the World Trade Center Complex in NYC for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, as well as Mr. Silverstein and Mr. Frank Lowy.
It had been in the works since the first commercial flight guided by global positioning landed at Newark International Airport in September 1998. The Press Release is at http://www.panynj.gov/pr/127-98.html.
3 days after the scheduled first landing another Press Release announced "In Historic Shift, Port Authority puts World Trade Center on Market" http://www.panynj.gov/pr/133-98.html
The fraudulent real estate development project took time and money to plan, build the specialty aircraft that hit the towers, plan and plant the explosives and buy the politicians.
The problem came in 2000 when Bush lost Florida to Al Gore. They did some fancy legal gyrations and the Supreme Court appointed by his father was forced to repay the favors ruled in his favor.
Without that there would not have been a 9/11/01.
They could not buy Mr. Gore.
Submitted by NJcpaTOM on Sun, 02/18/2007 - 1:41am.
.. they will keep the war going in Iraq as a diversion as well as take advantage of every other opportunity to keep the truth hidden.
The truth movement needs to make re-opening the investigation a voting issue.
It is my belief that 9/11 would not have happened if George Bush was not appointed President in 2000.
The Pentagon and Shanksville were diversions for the real insurance fraud staged by the wealthy elitists involved with the advanced planning of clearing the World Trade Center Complex in NYC for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, as well as Mr. Silverstein and Mr. Frank Lowy.
It had been in the works since the first commercial flight guided by global positioning landed at Newark International Airport in September 1998. The Press Release is at http://www.panynj.gov/pr/127-98.html.
3 days after the scheduled first landing another Press Release announced "In Historic Shift, Port Authority puts World Trade Center on Market" http://www.panynj.gov/pr/133-98.html
The fraudulent real estate development project took time and money to plan, build the specialty aircraft that hit the towers, plan and plant the explosives and buy the politicians.
The problem came in 2000 when Bush lost Florida to Al Gore. They did some fancy legal gyrations and the Supreme Court appointed by his father was forced to repay the favors ruled in his favor.
Without that there would not have been a 9/11/01.
They could not buy Mr. Gore.
Submitted by NJcpaTOM on Sun, 02/18/2007 - 1:41am.
Wednesday, January 10, 2007
"9/11 Associate Is Sentenced in Germay to 15 Years" - NY Times
The article by Mark Lander is located at
On Monday a German court "sentenced a friend of the September 11 hijackers to 15 years in prison for being an accessory in the murders of 246 people aboard the commercial planes used in the attacks."
The article states "The sentencing of the man, a Moroccan named Mounire el-Motassadeq, is a potentially decisive milestone in a complex and politically delicate case that has wended its way through the German courts for 5 years."
Apparently, he went to Germany in 1993 to study engineering and fell in with a "radical Islamic group in Hamburg that included two of the hijackers, Mohamed Atta and Marwan al-Shehhi, is one of only two people to be convicted in the 9/11 attacks. The other - Zacarias Moussaoui, a French citizen of Moroccan descent - is serving a life sentence in Colorado."
Mr. Motassadeq was first tried in 2003 and was found guilty of 3,066 counts of accessory to murder but that verdict was overturned on appeal and he was put on trial a second time.
It goes on to say that the German prosecutors struggled to make a case "in part because of what they said was a lack of cooperation from the United States in sharing evidence".
The article also said that his lawyer planned to appeal, either to the European Court of human Rights or by demanding a third trial in Hamburg based on new evidence and that he has already filed an appeal with the Federal Constitutional Court, the highest German court.
-------------------------
I sent an email today to Udo Jacob, the defense attorney. Indicating that it is my belief that for justice to be done, the United States should have to prove to the world that the hijackers actually carried out the 9/11 events.
I told him that some of the FBI's hijackers have been reported alive and well living in other countries, the FBI has no hard evidence that Osama bin Laden had anything to do with 9/11 and that the CIA shut down the division that was looking for Osama bin Laden.
I mentioned that members of the Bush Administration are suspected as having advance knowledge that the events were going to take place, and much more. I even went into the appearance of controlled demolition, lack of debris, bodies and luggage at the Pentagon and in Shanksville, PA.
I included links to the french website that is devoted to the pentagon
and a website where he could download videos .
I suggested that he at least watch "911: In Plane Site", "Loose Change 2E" (available in German), "911 Eyewitness" and 9/11 Mysteries - Part 1 - Demolitions".
I also told him my opinion of the official fairy tale, FEMA & NIST reports. I mentioned that there were a lot of organizations that were seeking to have a new independent investigation.
On Monday a German court "sentenced a friend of the September 11 hijackers to 15 years in prison for being an accessory in the murders of 246 people aboard the commercial planes used in the attacks."
The article states "The sentencing of the man, a Moroccan named Mounire el-Motassadeq, is a potentially decisive milestone in a complex and politically delicate case that has wended its way through the German courts for 5 years."
Apparently, he went to Germany in 1993 to study engineering and fell in with a "radical Islamic group in Hamburg that included two of the hijackers, Mohamed Atta and Marwan al-Shehhi, is one of only two people to be convicted in the 9/11 attacks. The other - Zacarias Moussaoui, a French citizen of Moroccan descent - is serving a life sentence in Colorado."
Mr. Motassadeq was first tried in 2003 and was found guilty of 3,066 counts of accessory to murder but that verdict was overturned on appeal and he was put on trial a second time.
It goes on to say that the German prosecutors struggled to make a case "in part because of what they said was a lack of cooperation from the United States in sharing evidence".
The article also said that his lawyer planned to appeal, either to the European Court of human Rights or by demanding a third trial in Hamburg based on new evidence and that he has already filed an appeal with the Federal Constitutional Court, the highest German court.
-------------------------
I sent an email today to Udo Jacob, the defense attorney. Indicating that it is my belief that for justice to be done, the United States should have to prove to the world that the hijackers actually carried out the 9/11 events.
I told him that some of the FBI's hijackers have been reported alive and well living in other countries, the FBI has no hard evidence that Osama bin Laden had anything to do with 9/11 and that the CIA shut down the division that was looking for Osama bin Laden.
I mentioned that members of the Bush Administration are suspected as having advance knowledge that the events were going to take place, and much more. I even went into the appearance of controlled demolition, lack of debris, bodies and luggage at the Pentagon and in Shanksville, PA.
I included links to the french website that is devoted to the pentagon
and a website where he could download videos .
I suggested that he at least watch "911: In Plane Site", "Loose Change 2E" (available in German), "911 Eyewitness" and 9/11 Mysteries - Part 1 - Demolitions".
I also told him my opinion of the official fairy tale, FEMA & NIST reports. I mentioned that there were a lot of organizations that were seeking to have a new independent investigation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)