Tuesday, September 25, 2007

Answer to a Yahoo Question:

"Should Bush be tried for Treason for orchestrating 9/11?"

Answer:

Which one ?
Bush Sr. was involved more than his brat of a son.
Bush Sr. was also in Dallas when JFK was shot.
Bush Sr. was recruited and trained by the CIA in the mid 1950s to recruit and train terrorists to invade another sovereign country (Cuba).
Bush Sr. has the family relationship with the Bin-Laden family as well as the financial relationship.
Bush Sr. is a frustrated loser. If the Warren Commission Report wasn't so easy to cover up the facts the way the 9/11 Commission Report tried too. 9/11 never would have been planned.
There had been to many promises made to more powerful people than the Bush family and to much money had been spent prewriting legislation and customizing the aircraft that hit the towers and planting the explosives that they needed George W Bush in the White House to ensure things would go their way.
That's where the Coup of the 2000 presidential election came into play. Having George W Bush lose was unacceptable and thus the Bush Sr. leaned on some of the Judges that should have, and were really required to, recuse themselves but they did not. The final 5-4 vote included a Judge that had been appointed by Bush Sr when he was President and another who Bush Sr. made sure was well rewarded afterwards.
The US Supreme Court gave the Bush crime family the US government and the power that went with it and they have been the real extremists terrorists trying to force "Globalization" of the world as their agenda.

The US Constitution and Bill Of Rights have been eroded and taken away by these war criminals. assassins, terrorists, liars and killers.

The Miller Center of Public Affairs of the University of Virginia has a web-page called "American President: An online Reference Resource".

It divides the US 200+ year history into 8 categories, listing the US Presidents who were in office during those periods.
Although you will only see 6 categories when you scroll down the page from the link below, you will find the fourth and eighth category by moving the bar at the bottom of the page to the left.

The 8th Category is labeled "Globalization (1989- )".
The Presidents listed are "George H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush".

Hitler wanted to rule the world.
Are these presidents any different ?


Sources:
http://www.millercenter.virginia.edu/academic/americanpresident/

Sunday, September 23, 2007

GW - Standing up to Fascism

has nothing to do with one's ability to be a "real man".

Some fascists are "real men". They just lack honesty and have no moral beliefs. Stooges may be a better word for it.

I first bumped into the word "Globalization" last weekend at the Miller Center website. They broke our 200+ year history into 8 categories.
http://www.millercenter.virginia.edu/academic/americanpresident/

I have no idea why but that's what is displayed at that website. The last Category is labeled "Globalization" (1989- ) and lists presidents George H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush.

Today I read an article where Nancy Pelosi referred to the term Globalization and Alan Greenspan claimed that Bill Clinton embraced Globalization.

I do not like the term "Globalization". I think it stinks of Hitler and his set of Fascists.

BUT the term does explain why the 2000 Coup of the presidency was so important to those who were dishonest enough to cave into the pressure from the Bush Crime Family and the other countries that were also involved in 9/11.

There were at least 2 US Supreme court Judges who should have recuse themselves from voting on the 5-4 decision to appoint GWB president. Especially the one that was appointed by his father Bush Sr.

They don't teach the Bill of Rights or Constitution in history anymore. They are making students in some of the New Jersey Middle schools wear uniforms in public schools, similar to the Nazi youth league.

I am glad that Dan Rather has the guts to bring out the fact that the government has been influencing the media for a very long time.

The devaluing of the dollar is one of the economic means of lowering our standards of living without having to deal with the Constitution.

Our children, even the college graduates don't have any idea how bad off they are. That scares me. They are willing to sign anything even though it may not be what they think they are signing. That's where the foreclosures have come from.

I am going to become more of an activist and start handing out copies of the Bill of Rights and US Constitution. They need to be re-educated and think for themselves rather than rely on what someone is telling them to think.

Friday, September 21, 2007

100 % Correct Jon -

It is appearing that they will be able to use the Presidential Directive # 51 prior to the 2008 presidential election.
If on nothing else they will put us in a depression economically. Did you notice how the price of oil has gone up to record highs and yet the gasoline is still less than $3.00 a gallon ?

The Traitors are running this country into the ground.
There is no Justice in America. They reward "incompetence" in the military with an appointment to the Joint Chief of Staffs.
No one has to obey their oaths, or they will end up like Jonh O'Niel and/or Frank Wilson's wife. No punishment for the offender either.

The are just keeping us busy with garbage, making financial slaves out of our children with the massive Student Loans to attend colleges and universities to get degrees that are worthless because there are no jobs.

Getting people into debt with the financial crisis. Do you really think that the government would release the real statistics about the financial condition of the country ?

I bet they don't even know the Truth about our national debt. They never were interested in finding out anything that has words included such as "truth" and/or "honor". There are a lot more but those are just words. They have no place in this United States Government unless they are using them against you.

I better stop. I'm sure this will get voted down. But at least I have a place to get it out of my system and share my thoughts with others.

Thank You 911 Blogger.com

Where is William Wallace when we need him ?
God Save America

Never underestimate your enemy.

I was never interested in history. I am a forensic accountant. My mother thought I should have been a lawyer but I don't get anything from print in books so I went my own way. I guess she was right.

I ran into this the other day and have not had the opportunity to go back to the site and explore more. They have broken our 200+ year history into eight categories. You will need to use your mouse to shift the screen because they made the page to wide to see the entire page. The eighth category listed is "Globalization" (1989- ) and lists "George H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush).
http://www.millercenter.virginia.edu/academic/americanpresident/

I may not be the brightest bulb in the package but I can't recall that our Constitution gives the President powers to try and run the world.
Didn't Hitler try to go that route ?
What, if anything does the United Nations think about this ?
We have been violating the 1945 signed Charter to the United Nations ever since the CIA was created in 1947.
Eisenhower/Nixon Administration funded covert operations, terrorist training, propaganda stations and sent insurgents into Cuba.
They admitted it in their "Family Jewels" that was recently released. Don't think for one minuet that I believe that they have admitted everything either.
They got away with confusion and chaos in Dallas. Had the Warren Commission Report been attacked as bad as we are trying to do to the 9/11 Commission report they never would have put the plans in motion, involved the other countries secret agencies, etc. to do 9/11.
But they did and they got backing from a great many other secret agencies, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Pakistan, their friends the Bin-Laden family, the UK, multi-billionaires like the crooked Frank Lowy, etc. They planned for more than two years, spent a great deal of money but it took a voter fraud in Florida for the US Supreme Court on a close decision, helped by some of the Judges who should have recuse themselves. Like maybe the one who George H.W. Bush appointed to the Supreme Court in what turned out to be the 2000 presidential give-a-way as well as the death of America and the Constitution, economy, land of the free, home of the brave "with Liberty and Justice for all".
There has not been any Justice since then. Nice words but apparently they are only being used to manipulate the people who really have no idea about what is going on and how much trouble we are really in financially.
I don't see any of the elected officials nor and Officers in the Military who are willing to live up to their oaths to protect and defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic.
The real terrorists are in Washington.

Monday, September 17, 2007

Michael B. Mukasey - Attorney General ?

For all those uninformed members of the Truth Movement community that may never had heard about the man that Mr. George W. Bush nominated for Attorney General before his Wikipedia page includes "Mukasey also was the judge in the litigation between developer Larry Silverstein and several insurance companies arising from the destruction of the World Trade Center.[6]"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_B._Mukasey

I am a Forensic Accountant and to be perfectly honest, I didn't give the events of 9/11 any attention when they happened. My wife had been shopping the the Century 21 store across the street when the first plane hit, she went into her office and called me. I was on the telephone with her when I heard the second plane it. Being busy with the fraud case, I strongly suggested that she leave work, head away from the Towers by going East and North, and call me to pick her up. I did not hear from her again until she arrived home near midnight.

I had been deeply involved with a litigation case that involved a large national bank and their continued overcharging and abuses of certain fiduciary accounts that they had fiduciary responsibilities over. We were retained in 1998, each of the 3 fiduciary accounts had been under the national banks fiduciary care for 11 years.

To make a long story short, after the cases settled a friend of mine suggested I watch "911: In Plane Site" during late 2005 or early 2006. Watching that video has changed my life.

Having just completed a successful fraud assignment against a large national bank I had some free time and decided that there had to be some sort of independent insurance investigations going on regarding the 9/11 events. I emailed many of the larger companies offering my assistance but received no replies.

I started to find out more about the litigation and was quite disturbed to find that the Judge had accepted that case despite the fact that there was no mention of any results of any insurance, or any other type of the required investigations by the FAA, FBI or NYS investigations.

I even tried to find the insurance claim that Mr Silverstein filed with his insurance company for WTC 7 and have not been able to find it to date. I know that if I was the one to cause my house to collapse - I would be arrested and denied recovery. Since Mr. Silverstein admitted on PBS that a decision to "Pull the building was made and we watched it fall". I think that he should have been arrested and denied any payment. That statement made it very apparent to me that he had been aware that WTC 7 had been rigged with explosives.

If this is the type of "Justice" that Mr. George W. Bush plans to continue with this man's nomination as the Attorney General, Mr. Bush should reconsider his choice and Congress should not accept the nomination nor waste their time going through the motions. If the nominated ex-Judge wants something for his country let him go to work for a law firm and try to right some of the wrongs that he did to this country when he was a Judge.

Saturday, September 15, 2007

American Presidents & "Globalization"

I was researching something else yesterday and quite by accident I ran into the following webpage.
http://www.millercenter.virginia.edu/academic/americanpresident/

"American President: An Online Reference Resource
In-depth information reviewed by prominent scholars on each President and administration
Welcome to the redesigned AmericanPresident.org web site. Here you will find the content from the original site in an improved presentation. We have more fully integrated AmericanPresident.org with its longtime host, the Miller Center of Public Affairs at the University of Virginia, the nation’s leading research institute for the study of the American presidency.

Our editors are working on updating the Key Events section and portions of the Presidency in Action section of the former web site.

American President: An Online Reference Resource is a comprehensive collection of material about the Presidents of the United States and the history of the presidency. This web site features essays about each President and their lives before, during, and after their presidential terms. It additionally provides information about the First Lady and cabinet officials of each administration.

A collection of essays on the President at Work delves into the function, responsibilities, and organization of the modern presidency and traces the history and evolution of presidential duties."

----
The page then has broken the 200+ years of our nations history into eight categories.
"Early Republic (1789-1829); Jackson Democracy (1829-1853); Sectional Conflict (1853-1881); Gilded Age (1881-1897); Progressive Era (1897-1921); Depression & World Conflict (1921-1961); Social Change & Soviet Relations (1961-1989) and Globalization (1989- )". The names of the Presidents are listed under each category.

What concerns me is the last category "Globalization". The presidents listed are "George H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush".

I am sure that when I revisit the website I will be able to find out more information about "Globalization" and how an American President has apparently risen above keeping the oath of office that he took to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

Seeing as I just found out about this and have not heard any of the 2008 presidential candidates bring up the subject of "Globalization". I wonder how many other Americans know about it. I wonder if any of the leaders of the other foreign countries are aware of this and approve of what is going on.

"Globalization" is a good word to explain why the president has been importing toys from China with lead paint to "Dumb" our children. It also explains some of 9/11 and the announcement that the "Air was safe to breath" at Ground Zero. If you saw the History Channel program regarding the sorting of the debris that was removed from Ground Zero, you saw that the people who filled the buckets with the debris were not equipped nearly as well as the sorters at Fishkill. The sorters had the same type of protective outfits that the teams that appeared at the alleged Shanksville crash site and the alleged Pentagon crash site.

As I see it, America is no longer the land of the brave and home of the free. They have been slowly redefining truth and justice to fit their own Globalization plans. There isn't any truth or justice in America anymore and there hasn't been any since John F Kennedy was assassinated by a series of covert operations that involved a wide range of secret government agencies, international crime families, etc. The Warren Commission did the original cover-up and the secret government agencies grew and became more dangerous. They had gotten away with it and they wanted more.

The events of 9/11 had the same M.O. Various multinational secret government agencies, trillions of dollars spent during the planning, building and equipping the two specialty aircraft that hit the Towers, prewriting complicated legislation to pay money to the corporations (airliners, delivery services, etc) and the new product for the insurance companies to sell (Terrorism Risk Insurance) to prevent any investigations, payoffs to the media, etc.

There was one slight problem. George W. Bush, was like his father and brother Jeb and couldn't win fair voter elections. The 2000 presidential election involved the Florida voter fraud, litigation and revelation of the corruption of the US Supreme Court Judges who should have recuse themselves. The vote was a 5-4 and the US Supreme Court handed America over to the real Terrorists.

There are more powerful people than the Bush Crime Family. People who have their own secret agencies and/or royal guards and/or bodyguards that even the Bush Family dare not say "no" too.

I would appreciate any links to information to learn why this "Globalization" since 1989 has been kept from the concerned citizens of the world and where I can find any information that may have been released to the United Nations about their "Globalization" plans.

I thought that getting the information about this "Globalization" category out to the 911 Truth movement had a high priority.

Saturday, September 8, 2007

Feedback to CBC 911 - 2006 Program

Hi,
I know I am over a year late providing you this feedback regarding your 2006 911 Program but I just watched it for the first time and have added the link into my "favorites".

As a concerned citizen of the world and an embarrassed citizen of the United States, I would like to thank you for producing that program.
Although I feel that I must agree with the last viewers comment about you giving the last word to a profit oriented magazine editor rather than a person who is qualified to address the subject matter. Popular Mechanics may be in business for over 100 years as he says but I have seen some of their magazines from the S. I don't consider how long a business has been able to make money as a sign of their qualifications on any of the 9/11 matters. It is good business sense for them to refute the claims because their business is purely profit oriented.

After he stated that he spoke to people who responded about various subjects did you confirm that he had in fact contacted them and confirmed what he was told ?

I am over 61 years old and it saddens me that I cannot say that I am proud to be an American anymore. However, I have not given up trying to get back the Constitutional rights and social values that I was taught which have been stolen from us by the events of 9/11 and the overflow to the other countries of the world.

Please remind the people around the world that the aftermath from 9/11 has effected everybody in a negative way, except for the warmongers and power elite. As an American I am respectfully requesting that on occasion you would include my apology to every citizen of any country who has been victimized or hurt by the people who are currently in control of the US Government and have been violating the Charter of the United Nations since 1947. I know JFK was against secret governments and had not the Warren Commission been so widely accepted by the trusting country perhaps the secret government agencies would not be in the power position that they are.

It is my opinion that the US Supreme court decision concerning the 2000 presidential election Florida voter fraud handed Bush the power with a 5-4 decision.

If you would like to discuss any of the above, I can provide you links to documents and free down loadable videos to support my opinion.
Just yesterday I sent an email to the National Security Archives requesting information regarding the re-establishment of Justice in America.

Again - I Deleted the personal contact information for this post

Friday, September 7, 2007

Email to: The National Security Archive

Hello,

I am a 61 year old forensic accountant. I have a NYS Certified Public Accountant (CPA) and am a Diplomate of the America Board of Forensic Accountants (DABFA).

I belong to the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), The New York State Society of CPAs (NYSSCPA) and the New Jersey Society of CPAs (NJSCPA).

I had a great grandfather who fought in the Civil War.
I have relatives who graduated from West Point (1st one was in 1924) and his son in 1952 and perhaps his son.

My late father earned a PhD. at the University of Michigan where he met my mother who was also a UM graduate in Nursing.
My father worked for DuPont for more than 40 years doing research in the Photo Products Division.

My Grandfather's registration card for the first Draft is #1 for our section. Both he and my father were Exhaled Rulers in the Benevolent Order of the Elks.

My father was the second Eagle Scout (Class of 1934) of Troop 5, which is sponsored by Holy Trinity Catholic Church in Hackensack. Troop 5 is the first Troop in the history of the Boy Scouts of America to be sponsored by a Catholic Church. The original charter for the Troop dated 1915 has the names of two of my relatives and has never stopped serving the Hackensack, NJ Community.

I am an Eagle Scout (class of 1959). In addition to the 21 merit badges required for eagle I earned an additional 30 and have received two sets of Palms.

My son is an Eagle Scout (class of 1995) with one palm. He was an All-American Punter for the Ithaca Bombers and has set many of the schools records which are still standing. He earned a Masters of Business Administration.

Maybe you can tell that I was raised to be a proud American and a good citizen of the United States as were and are my relatives.

I would not like anybody to think that there is anyway that I will not do what I think is the best for my country. Regardless of what others may say. Apparently I am one of the few who took my Scout Oath and Law seriously.

To be perfectly honest I don't think that there are many of the elected officials that aware that they have been violating their oaths to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States from the domestic enemies that were started in 1947 when President Truman signed the law that created the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

Are you aware that 2 of the 3 functions of the CIA as described in the Wikipedia about 4 revisions ago are direct violation of the Charter of the United Nations (UN) that was signed in 1945 with 49 other countries?

I started to do my own investigations about the events of 9/11 and I ended up in 1945 & 1947. I was born in 1946 and raised properly. 1 income earner, housewife/nurse/mother comfortable lower middle class, not afraid to work for what we wanted and taught not to buy anything unless you had the money to pay for it.

Your efforts that have brought forth the secret covert operations that were approved the Eisenhower/Nixon administration has attracted my attention and therefore I continued to move forward from that point.

I understand that President Woodrow Wilson made a speech to Congress in January 1918, 10 months before WWI ended. I think it is known as his famous 14 point speech. I think that the solution to everything is in the very first point. OPEN GOVERNMENTS. Diplomatic solutions with meetings out in the OPEN - not behind closed doors.

I found that John F Kennedy had inherited the secret terrorist CIA agency and was of a mind to close it. After he was blamed for the failed Bay of Pigs raid into Cuba he made a speech to a group from the American Press. The name of the group may be wrong here but the speech was made on 4/27/1961. I’m better with numbers than names. During that speech he asked the press to help him uncover any and all secret government operations and that he was not giving any member of his administration authority to hide anything from the press.

I was a junior in high school at that time and wasn’t very interested in history. A friend of mine and I went to our history teachers house to watch the funeral with him though. We needed the extra credit. Everything seemed so peaceful during his years. He was truly a classic hero.

During my investigation I came upon information that leads me to believe that the Warren Committee was as much as a showpiece as the official 9/11 commission. Also that the Warren Commission Report is just as faulty as the 9/11 Commission report except they started their “investigation” so fast. It appeared as if they really wanted to know who shot JFK. It was a secret government scam. I believe that you were my sources regarding the future Congressional hearings which admitted the “Possibility of a Conspiracy”. To little – to late.

I have looked into the 2000 presidential election voter fraud in Florida. There are at least 2 videos available for free downloading if you would be interested to watch them but you probably already know more than what is in those videos.

It is my desire to investigate the US Supreme Court Judges that appointed the current Bush as emperor. I am doing this as a patriotic individual with an education that I earned without having to go into financial debt on behalf of this country. I used to be proud to be an American. I am not so proud anymore.

Without those Judges in place Mr. Bush would not be president. The 2000 election, in my opinion was a Coup of the US Government and they have raped and pillaged not only our rights but our money and our children as well. My son has no idea how much trouble this country is really in. They are going at us from a variety of directions and not looking like they will let up anytime soon.

The Joints Chief of Staff have given over the military to them and Congress appears to be the breeding ground for corruption.

The key in my mind is first to restore JUSTICE to this country which finally brings me to my question.

Are there any provisions in the Constitution that will permit a removal of a sitting US Supreme Court Judge ?

I think that in light of the relationships between Judges who might and/or should have removed themselves from the 2000 election Coup, there may be a way and/or should be a way to start an investigation for the removal of one or more of them.

The Bush administration should not be permitted to spread terror all over the world. They have abused the Powers of the Executive Branch of the Government and compromised both the Judicial and Legislative Branches.

I believe that we still can save the United States of America and restore the Constitutional rights of the citizens by going through and cleaning out all of the bought and paid for Judges. Not necessarily all at once. But a move on one or two and someone would start to pay attention. Congress would no longer have their hands tied. Ted Kennedy might be able to stop drinking and look himself in the mirror in the morning. He was one of the reasons that I did not pay much attention so many years ago. They left him planted there as a display for the name.

They fooled me more than once and I don’t like to get fooled.

If you are aware of anyplace I can look for information regarding any possible removal of a US Supreme Court Judge please let me know.

Thank You for your time and the work that you have been successful with I am sure that turning the present Department of Injustice into a real Department of Justice would also help with your backlog requests.

I deleted my name etc for this post but I have included them in the email.

Thursday, September 6, 2007

Email reply to - How are you

Hi Nick,
I just spent an hour responding to your question about what's happening and as I was about to add a link to free video downloads Downloads AOL froze and I lost it all. I don't think AOL wants my business.

Anyway, I'll let all the boring stuff go and ask you to download and watch "Unprecedented - The 2000 Presidential Election" in two parts of 47 megs and "How Bush Stole The Election BBC Documentary" about 48 megs.

From my own investigations into where this country went wrong was in 1947 when some warmonger convinced Truman to sign the law that created the CIA. I had been answering Questions that were being asked in the Yahoo feature, still do once in a while, but they made it difficult for me by removing Google videos that I linked to and they have changed the Wikipedia page 4 or 5 times since I also linked to that page because 2 of the 3 functions of the CIA are direct violations of the UN charter signed in 1945 (which I also added a link to for a reference). I have a 20% Best Answers rating.
I don't recall if I gave you a copy of a FBI agent's report of a telephone call received from a Mr. George H, W. Bush as President of Zapata Oil. The report included mention that Mr. Bush overheard someone threaten to kill Kennedy when he went to Houston. It also gave information that he would be staying in the Dallas-Sheraton that nigh and will be returning home in the morning. It is dated the day they shot JFK. Zapata Oil - it has since come out was a cover for the training and recruiting CIA agents and insurgents against first Cuba then Castro.
Eisenhower and Nixon were the ones who appropriated $13 billion (S) dollars to fund the covert operations. JFK was against secrecy in government and I may have given you a copy of a speech that he gave to a press association in which he asked for their help exposing any secret activity that was in his administration. It was after they failed the Bay of Pigs invasion. Silly Bush family couldn't get anything right. They couldn't win fair elections. I had heard that the guy that tried to shoot Regan when Bush was VP was a cousin of Bush.

I think, the first step to restoring this country will be to investigate, challenge and impeach the Judges that gave the crown to Bush. Without Bush as president there never would have been a 9/11. There was billions perhaps trillions of dollars that had been spent, to much time spent, to many promises made to people that even they wouldn't dare say NO.
There are multi-national billionaires, Royalty who have their own secret covert agencies, armies. Even the worlds largest corporations are involved. Boeing refused to ID the second plane that hit a tower citing "national security" issues when asked by an Investigative reporter from Spain who noticed the Pod attached to the bottom from a picture on "Newdsday" magazine. She even pointed out that one of the engines had been relocated on the wing to act as a counter balance.

They way I look at my position in all of this is that the worst they can do is kill me. But God has been keeping me alive for a reason. In my first email I had mentioned my new swelling in the brain but, as you are aware I have been dealing with them since 1991.
Besides, they have made this country an embarrassment to live in and I don't like that. What's the Hew Hampshire motto "Live Free or Die" ? When God wants me to stop trying to restore freedom to this country He will let me die. It's really not up to me.
I have relatives who graduated from West Point who died for their country. Other relatives that were military families who died for their country. A great grandfather who fought in the civil war. Is it OK for me to pick up the Battle Flag and continue the charge even though my grandfather was a Banker who got a promotion with Morgan Guaranty Trust in 1929 ?

Wow - another long email. surprise.
Aren't you glad that you asked the question "How are you"?

Wednesday, September 5, 2007

A reply to a Comment about 9/11 not being the start of our problems.

Our problem started in 1947 when Truman signed the law that created the CIA. Just 2 years prior Truman signed the Charter to the United Nations with 49 other countries.

Here is a link to the Preamble of the Charter. If you would be so kind to read it you will find that the preamble contains words to the effect that "We would learn tolerance and act as good neighbors".
http://www.un.org/aboutun/charter/index.html

The CIA has released their "Family Jewels" which only shows that they were training and recruiting terrorists and performing covert operations since the early 1950s.
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB222/index.htm

There is even a FBI document dated 11/22/1963 where a person named George H W Bush called a agent to report a death threat made against Kennedy when he went to Houston. The report states that the caller identified himself as President of Zapata Oil, would be staying at the Dallas-Sheraton that night and returning home the following day. Zapata Oil has since been known to be one of the CIA's covers for their terrorist activities into and against Cuba in the late 1950s.

I was a junior in high school when JFK was executed by the secret government who have become so powerful over the years that they did not mind at all showing us what a mockery our Judicial System was during the 2000 presidential Coup.

To much time and money from the more powerful elite, Royalty and Corporate Execs had been spent for Gore to win. I am talking multi-national billionaires. Royalty and people who have their own secret agencies that can help with the dirty work. The kind that you don't say no too. They needed George Junior to take the lead for his father who is able to control him.

Woodrow Wilson said in a speech to congress in 1918. 10 months before WWI ended that the only way to prevent wars was to be diplomatically with negotiations done OUT IN THE OPEN.

JFK inherited Eisenhower's and Nixon's Cuba activity and he did not approve. He had made a speech where he called on the American Press to help him uncover and secret parts of his administration.
http://www.jfklibrary.org/Historical+Resources/Archives/Reference+Desk/Speeches/JFK/003POF03NewspaperPublishers04271961.htm

I also think that we should start to investigate the Judges of the US Supreme Court who voted for Bush. THEY WERE THE ONES THAT GAVE OUR FREEDOMS AWAY.

Tuesday, September 4, 2007

9-11 New World Rising (First Cut) Comments posted

As promised above I have watched the google video. I watched almost 1 hr & 19 min which did a dead end with David Rockefeller. It was labeled "first cut" so I am assuming that will change.

To be 100% honest, I have mixed feelings about what I have just seen and hope that I will be able to make some suggestions that may help the truth movement make progress.

I should warn you that I had sent an email to the people at http://www.newworldrisingmovie.com/ that started with my attempt to purchase one of the DVDs using the non-functioning Pay Pal link that appeared there at that time.

But that was before I watched this first cut. It mentions names of some of the wealthy but what it has not done, and maybe it is just because there is to much material for one DVD.

I also could not determine what driving point was supposed to be for a variety of reasons. If the DVD is supposed to prove that the towers were brought down with controlled demolition, it failed.

If the DVD is intended to go into some of the people who benefited from bringing down the Towers, it is incomplete. One of the biggest benefactors was the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey itself. As well as the two ex governors of NJ who were instrumental in the endgame (Kean - Chairman of 9/11 commission & Whitman Director of EPA who made the "Air is safe to breath remark") and the NY ex-governor who assured the speedy clean up of ground zero, ie illegal removal of evidence.
As well as Rudy G who, in my opinion is left in the Presidential race so there will be a race, so the people will think there will be a race to a 2008 presidential election which may never come to pass. It is his reward for playing along with the big boys.


I think that you gave the sellout, Peter Jennings, more time than the brave Dan Rather who is stuck on a cable program the last I heard for doing his usual good job. His voice makes it clear that they were brought down by controlled demolition. I'd tie that together with some of the BBC 23 minute early stuff. There were also some duplications of shots which could give you more space for new material. Don't forget that Peter Jennings just outright lied in a TV show about the Kennedy assassination. I wouldn't give liars more air time than the honest reporters who appear to be doing their jobs on the streets.

There were new, to me, views of WTC 7 coming down. I'd leave them in. WTC 7 was the building that Rudy used over $13 million of NYC taxpayer money to turn the 23rd floor into a bunkerish command center. I think that was the one that he avoided mentioning that he did not even bother to try to get in because we won't let you. Just like he can pretend to be a woman, he can also pretend to be other things also. If Rudy had been a man he would have shown up at WTC 7 and insisted, as the Mayor of taxpayers of NYC, entering into the command center bunker.
I'd just build a case that during the 1980s and/or 1990s that NYC spent over $13 million to be to City's Disaster Command Center and find out more details about the strength of it, what equipment had been installed; how it had it's own air and water supply, etc.
Then you can use the piece where when he is out on the streets you can use the reporters questions about the command center. I had heard that after the attempted 1993 FBI terrorist bombing some people were trying to claim that the Command Center had been moved but I have no confirm that I ever heard of putting a command center in what had already been a target. They might have tried knocking them down in 1993 but they sadly underestimated the strength of those towers.
Also mentioning the added strength to the 23rd floor as the Command Bunker build-up makes the "collapse" that much more improbable especially with Rudy now safely uptown. They must have had him play like a Pied Piper and draw the media uptown so nobody would have cameras on WTC 7.
FEMA had been deployed to NYC on 9/10 I wouldn't put it past them to have promised Rudy that he would be able to run for president as incentive to keep quiet. He almost gets the truth out during some of the interviews.
I have a friend who lives 3 miles as the crow flys from ground zero who is experiencing difficulty breathing more and more. He lives in Brooklyn.
WTC 6 had more damages from the towers and were left to burn all day and days later had to be rigged and "Pulled". It's on a DVD I just don't recall which one at present.

If your point is the people at the end you may do well to eliminate Silverstien, since you left out Lowy and Eisenberg, Kean & Whitman and maybe do a DVD on what The Port Authority of NY & NJ had to get out of it, what they got out of it and the technology that had already been tested in 1998 3 days prior to putting the Trade Center on the public market. September 1998 press release archives "New technology" press release 98-125 (I think). Announces the first successful landing of a commercial aircraft at their Newark Airport using only the Global Positioning System.

BTW - Your shot of the second jet crashing into the building is the clearest non-descriptive United Airlines wannabe I have ever seen and the flash out of the front is great also. Where did you get them?
I knew they had to be specialty built reinforced military aircraft. The flash was used to ensure penetration through the steel grid beams when it hit.

Also for your info one hit from the south going north and the other was headed south from the north. You may find that lining them up with WTC 7 might surprise you. It's my opinion that NYC's command center in WTC 7 was used to guide the pilot less aircraft using the Global Positioning System from 1998.

As far as the people go you haven't presented any dollar amounts that people generally associate with the term "benefit" them. You left out quite a few of the others. How about Peter Zelikow. the White House director of the 911 Commission ? He did write a book with Ms Rice, who also had advanced knowledge. Did you mention that.

I don't mean to sound negative towards your video. I think it has some great stuff but without an ending I haven't been able to draw this comment to a close. Until now.

If this doesn't get voted down. Please leave a reply. You should also have my email address if there is some way that I can help you. I will be glad to.

Sunday, September 2, 2007

Comment Posted at 911blogger re NY Times article

Every December 7th they do the same at Pearl Harbor. Whether FDR knew in advance is not important. He had already been elected by the people in a honest election.

We are stuck at 9/11 intentionally. That is were they want us to be stuck. 9/11 was inserted so that we really won't go back and challenge the 2000 Coup of our government and examine who benefited in the US Supreme Court for their votes that placed us in the position that permitted 9/11 to happen.

But that is just my comment to the NY Times wanting us to get-over 9/11. Why can't they help us get over it by doing some investigate reporting into the 2000 election for once?

By their ignoring the unprecedented events of the 2000 election, the NY Times has become nothing more than a propaganda trash rag for the Bush administration.

"All the News that's fit to print", if they still use that phrase, has been wrong for years. I wouldn't know. I don't read trash propaganda that perpetrates Myths rather than printing real News.

The NY Times should have been and/or should re-investigate the Judges, events and decisions, rewards received after the decision that put the people in the right political positions that made 9/11 possible. We should be able to impeach a sitting US Supreme Court Judge for unethical behavior. They aren't God's that are above the law.

I challenge any young investigative reporter working for the NY Times to download and watch "Unprecedented - The 2000 Presidential Election" (Two Parts) and "Bush Stole The Election BBC Documentary" located for free downloading at: http://www.question911.com/linksall.htm

A Comment to a Blog re the History Channel Program and much, much more

I thought the program actually may have benefited the Truth Movement regardless of the verbal gibberish and contradictions that the Popular Mechanics Magazine Editor and researcher kept doing.

We won the spread of photos of the alleged "crash" sites showing the very little planted evidence.

I don't believe that the "hit piece" as it has been called was really a hit on the Truth Movement. How can anyone say that a program that is aired on national TV, especially the History Channel" can be bad for the Truth movement?

If it was intended to be a hit piece they would have done a much better job of it.
For example: They showed the actual picture of the PA "crater" and another jet crash. They stressed the point that the picture of the "crater" was used as evidence for the government in the trial of the 20th hijacker. The best evidence they could get of a passenger jet airliner crash was a "crater"?
How many people are really stupid enough to believe the dribble that a plane the size of United 93 could and/or would bury itself if it crashed into the ground at 700 miles per hour? Aircraft are not built that strong. They don't even do that when they crash into water.
And if it could bury itself how could the Coroner change his story from the original TV interview were Loose Change picked up the quote that after 20 minuets he stopped being a Coroner. And also notice that it wasn't a regular cop or first responder who mentioned the bodies spread around, who was he anyway? Was he even there on 9/11 or was he hired to play that part? And how could those bodies be spread around if the plane buried itself when it crashed into the "Crater"?

Also, the picture of the dark puff of smoke alleged to be from the "crash". The lady may have taken that picture when they did what they did to make that "crater" but she did not see the plane make that little puff of smoke. She is only blowing smoke as she appears to be either lacking of a great deal of common sense or has received some sort of renumeration for telling her tale their way.
My common sense tells me that if I were to believe their story that an aircraft the size of United 93 were to crash into that ground at 700 miles per hour with sufficient force to bury it out of sight leaving only the crater that there would not be just that dark little puff of smoke.

Don't you think that the dirt that covered the plane after it entered would have to have been thrown out of the hole in the first place?
Give me a break.

They failed to mention that a zealous Cleveland reporter had reported on the news Internet site that the Mayor of Cleveland had reported that United 93 had made a emergency landing at the Cleveland airport due to a "bomb scare".
They retracted that report after a Radio talk show had mentioned the posting. I think The Power Hour website still has the article archived. I printed one out. That area of PA has been spread with Dollars from the Victims Funds allocated. The City of Cleveland had been spending money Lobbying Washington for years.

If you can accept that United 93 landed at Cleveland airport and that since at least one of the hijackers from that flight has been reported alive and well in Saudi Arabia then why couldn't those cell phone calls be real in the sense that the passengers made them from the Cleveland airport and, at best, were forced to accept being put into the Witness Protection Program" or killed. I prefer not to discuss the passengers but I am not the one that had anything to do with what happened to them. If they were told that their loved ones died then they must be dead. I prefer to think that the "powers that be" aren't cruel enough to kill them when there are alternative choices available. I didn't go to any of the wakes nor funerals and did not see any bodies.

In my opinion, the fact that those versions were aired world wide was good for the movement. It casts doubt about the United 93 Movies that had been released and turned them into fiction. More people asking more questions = growth in the numbers of people who feel that they are also being spoon fed a Myth.

Secondly, The Pentagon and the words that the wings were sheered off when it hit the building. The beautiful Pentagon lawn. The pictures of the 16 ft hole in the third ring of the strongest building in the world. The pictures of how far away the little scraps of soft metal being picked up by men in military uniforms at a "crash site"? Those pictures being shown were great. The talk about the French website that doubts that a American Airlines passenger jet crashed there is great.
The dribble and lame excuses as to how only five frames of one camera showed that the plane went into the building was contrary to the part where they explained why the plane was able to do as much damage through the three rings as it did on the initial hit is more support for us.

Even the lousy graphic animation that showed the towers to be weaker than they really were for the start of the controlled demolition. They could have done a better job. The CIA knows how to do it better than they did.

My feeling is that since the military had planned an Operation in Portland about a bomb that started on the day that that 911 story aired may have saved the military from actually setting off the Bomb. FEMA was deployed to NYC on 9/10 according to the Director of FEMA at that time. Notice how fast he was replaced. The footage is in 911 Eyewitness.
I believe the next showing was aired on August 25th. Was it an accident that it was aired on the day that the Kennybonkport affair was going on ?

I think not. I had heard that there were rumblings among the elite of the world that some of them were not to happy with the plans that were coming out of the Bush Administration. It came out at a very tense time.

Perhaps, just perhaps, the program may have been intended as a show of strength by some of the saner "powers that be" that they will broadcast the 911 Conspiracies more than the Bush Administration wants them too.
I believe that there are some of the "powers that be" that have been doing things a lot longer than the Bush family and that they are smart enough not to want to turn their own boats over either.

We are at a very perilous point in time.
What is common knowledge among the 911 Truthers is that the Official 911 Commission Report was forced onto the Bush Administration, was interfered with and directed by one of the members of the Bush Administration that should have been investigated.
Thomas Kean, The Chairman of the Commission even wrote a book last November in which he indicated the interference that the Commission had received from the Bush administration, constant pressure to complete it and denied sufficient funds to do it properly.
He might have been better off retracting his signature from the Official Report at that time since his son was running for the Senate as the Republican Party candidate and might have won in NJ with his "Independent Reformer" campaign.

The Chairman of the Commission, Thomas Kean was also an ex-governor of the State of New Jersey, therefore, in my humble opinion, he was not independent enough because as the Governor of New Jersey he had been involved with the owner of the World Trade Center the Port Authority of New York & New Jersey and had appointment power and veto power over decisions that the Port Authority made.

Christine Todd Whitman, is also an ex-governor of the State of New Jersey and she was also the one who declared that the air was safe to breath. I understand that she is a distant family member of the Bush family. She appointed Mr. Eisenberg to the Board of Directors of the Port Authority and Mr. Eisenberg was the man that signed the lease agreements with Mr. Silverstein and Mr. Lowy''s Westfield Group for the Retail Stores in July 2001.

Oh, what the hell, I might as well put it here also, in 1998 The Port Authority of NY & NJ issued a press release which can be found at their website that announced the first successful landing of a commercial aircraft at their Newark Airport solely by the use of the Global Positioning System. (They had the technology to fly pilot-less aircraft into the buildings.) Three days later they made another announcement in a press release. "HISTORIC SHIFT IN POLICY" they put the World Trade Center on the Public Market.

I was once told when hired to manage a complex series of organizations properly that it is OK to Rock the Boat once and a while but don't ever tip the Boat over.

The Bush Administration has been getting very close to tipping the boat over. The economic numbers that are being released are by the same Bush Administration that released the Official Story of 911.

The economy is terrible. The numbers may look good but Osama bin Laden also has a good face for a villain.

The economic indicators will appear to be even better now that the Army is paying bonuses of $20,000 to people who are unemployed and have no health insurance. That should do well to keep down the unemployment statistics. Is that the type of statistics the stock market has been using?

No wonder there is a mortgage credit and foreclosure problem.
What is this administrations answer to this problem?
George W Bush wants to set up a Federal Housing Administration. A Government agency that provides mortgage insurance to borrowers through lenders in the private sector. This is according to a Yahoo news article dated 8/31/07.

Let me see if this makes sense, people who can't afford to pay for their current mortgages can buy insurance from a government agency that will pay the private sector if the borrower fails to pay.

If they can't pay their current mortgage now? How can adding a new cost to the mortgage make the situation any better? Lengthening the time of the loan may reduce the monthly payment amount but it will also keep the debtor in financial enslavement longer and is not a cost reduction. Will the Mortgage insurance be considered an Income Tax Deduction or will the lender need to make more money than the new mortgage insurance to pay the taxes for the Mortgage insurance they bought?

Printing more monopoly money won't work. It didn't work for Hitler in Germany.

I wonder if his brother Marvin is still involved with the insurance business in Houston as he was in 2001?

Is he just giving the insurance companies another product to sell to the citizens? Like the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act that kept the insurance companies from doing actual investigations into the events of 911 that would have shown the frauds for what they were.

When are you going to offer insurance to the college students so that they can graduate with higher student loans that most won't be able to pay back because all the skilled jobs are being outsourced?

Just like paying people to join the Army so that you have them to send to Iraq & die won't cure the unemployment problems where you took them from.

Those statistics haven't been right for years. I can't think of one economic indicator that I can trust since the Coup of the 2000 presidential fraud in Florida when the US Supreme Court handed Bush the country.

The "powers that be" had spent to much time and money planning 911 and it was essential that George W. Bush be president because his father can control him. The secret governments of the world are in control not us. The CIA has been very good at training terrorists since 1947 despite signing the Charter to the UN in 1945. 60th activation anniversary coming up on September 18th.

The elite don't have to keep their words. They want to own everything and everybody but in the process they are beginning to get anxious and are extremely close to turning the boat over.

I an begging the saner more intelligent members of the "powers that be" not to let America's boat turn over.

God Save America and the world.