Every December 7th they do the same at Pearl Harbor. Whether FDR knew in advance is not important. He had already been elected by the people in a honest election.
We are stuck at 9/11 intentionally. That is were they want us to be stuck. 9/11 was inserted so that we really won't go back and challenge the 2000 Coup of our government and examine who benefited in the US Supreme Court for their votes that placed us in the position that permitted 9/11 to happen.
But that is just my comment to the NY Times wanting us to get-over 9/11. Why can't they help us get over it by doing some investigate reporting into the 2000 election for once?
By their ignoring the unprecedented events of the 2000 election, the NY Times has become nothing more than a propaganda trash rag for the Bush administration.
"All the News that's fit to print", if they still use that phrase, has been wrong for years. I wouldn't know. I don't read trash propaganda that perpetrates Myths rather than printing real News.
The NY Times should have been and/or should re-investigate the Judges, events and decisions, rewards received after the decision that put the people in the right political positions that made 9/11 possible. We should be able to impeach a sitting US Supreme Court Judge for unethical behavior. They aren't God's that are above the law.
I challenge any young investigative reporter working for the NY Times to download and watch "Unprecedented - The 2000 Presidential Election" (Two Parts) and "Bush Stole The Election BBC Documentary" located for free downloading at: http://www.question911.com/linksall.htm
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment